1.
The EPO Boards of Appeal are prepared to take a
different view from that expressed in the decision. They are therefore a very
good forum for addressing mistakes or unfairness that might have happened at
first instance. They are also very good
at objectively assessing the first instance decisions, and can take a very
sophisticated approach to complex matters.
2.
In theory the Boards of Appeal do not consider
the entire case, but only whether the decision is correct or not. Therefore be prepared for them to only focus
on the decision, and the appeal should therefore be written with the same
focus.
3.
Appeal practice is becoming stricter in
admitting amendments. Try to ensure all
possible amendments are submitted at first instance, and in appeal try to file
amendments as early as possible.
4.
Be prepared for anything to happen, especially
at Oral Proceedings. The Boards of Appeal
make case law at the EPO and therefore will be open to arguments which might go
against the case law. Case law is
important at the EPO, but it can occasionally be reversed and one can succeed
by showing why one’s case is an exception to the case.
5.
Make sure that you think carefully about
strategy. There are no hard and fast
rules as to how an appeal should be structured.
As mentioned above the appeal should be focused on the decision. After that one needs to write in in the way
that best presents your case. You will
need to consider the extent to which you wish to make the same arguments again,
and the best balance between attacking the decision and reiterating your case.
6.
Make sure in your own mind you are aware of what
a reasonable outcome is and tailor your strategy accordingly. It can be
advantageous to come across as being very reasonable, avoiding arguments which
are too ambitious.
7.
Be mindful to address the concerns of the Board
during the proceedings. The specific issues they raise need to be focused on in
case they end up determining the outcome, even though in your opinion they
might not be important.
8.
Do not expect the impossible. Be aware that the Board of Appeal will need
to reach a decision they are happy with.
They will be wary of going too far beyond the existing case law or of
issuing a decision which might have a lot of repercussions for future cases.
9.
Boards of Appeal can be very practical in the
decisions they issue. Sometimes first
instance departments can be too rigid on deviating from case law and usual
European practice. However Boards of Appeal
can be good judges of where a little leniency is appropriate, particularly if
it results in a fairer decision.
10.
Boards of Appeal have a deeper understanding of
case law and European practice. They
will therefore be more open to cases which require a consideration of why case
law and practice are as they are, and can take a less formalistic attitude when
required.
You may also be interested in the related articles Tips for EPO Opposition Success and Assessing Contribution Over the Prior Art on a Biotech Case.
You may also be interested in the related articles Tips for EPO Opposition Success and Assessing Contribution Over the Prior Art on a Biotech Case.
An invaluable framework as ever from Holly IP!
ReplyDelete