Patent claims should cover the broadest expression of the
‘technical effect’ which is possible, and part of the art of a biotech patent
attorney is to be able to draft claims having considered the equivalents of all
the features present. Here are our favourite equivalents:
1. Homologues of
Sequences
Whenever specific protein or nucleic acid sequences are
mentioned thought should be given to homologous sequences that might be able to
provide the same function. That function might not necessarily be the natural
function of the sequence. For example for a vaccine invention the equivalent might
have the same antibody or T cell epitopes. Homologues are normally defined by
means of a minimal percentage homology to a specific sequence. In this case the
specification should also give an example of an algorithm that can be used to
calculate homology, though I have never come across an instance of an Examiner
requiring the algorithm to be mentioned in the claims. In the example below the
required function is to be able to tolerise an individual.
WO2010018378
1. A composition
for use in preventing or treating allergy to ragweed by tolerisation
comprising: (i) at least one original polypeptide selected from RGW03B, RGW03A
or RGW03 (SEQ ID NO's. 9, 8 or 7) or a variant thereof;
(ii) at least one original polypeptide selected from RGWOl, RGWOlA or RGWOlB (SEQ ID NO's. 1, 2 or 3) or a variant thereof; iii) at least one original polypeptide selected from RGW04 or RGW04A (SEQ ID Nos: 10 or 11) or a variant thereof; and
(iv) optionally one or more original polypeptides independently selected from any of SEQ ID NO's. 4-6 and 12-31 or variants thereof; wherein said variants are:
(a) a polypeptide of length 9 to 20 amino acids that comprises a region consisting of: the equivalent original peptide sequence; or a homologous sequence which has at least 65% homology to the equivalent original peptide sequence, which sequence is capable of tolerising an individual to the equivalent original peptide sequence, or (b) a polypeptide of length 9 to 20 amino acids that comprises a region consisting of a sequence that represents either: a fragment of the equivalent original peptide sequence; or a homologue of a fragment of the equivalent original peptide sequence, which sequence is capable of tolerising an individual to the equivalent original peptide sequence and has a length of at least 9 amino acids, and wherein said homologue has at least 65% homology to any 9 contiguous amino acids in the equivalent original peptide sequence.
(ii) at least one original polypeptide selected from RGWOl, RGWOlA or RGWOlB (SEQ ID NO's. 1, 2 or 3) or a variant thereof; iii) at least one original polypeptide selected from RGW04 or RGW04A (SEQ ID Nos: 10 or 11) or a variant thereof; and
(iv) optionally one or more original polypeptides independently selected from any of SEQ ID NO's. 4-6 and 12-31 or variants thereof; wherein said variants are:
(a) a polypeptide of length 9 to 20 amino acids that comprises a region consisting of: the equivalent original peptide sequence; or a homologous sequence which has at least 65% homology to the equivalent original peptide sequence, which sequence is capable of tolerising an individual to the equivalent original peptide sequence, or (b) a polypeptide of length 9 to 20 amino acids that comprises a region consisting of a sequence that represents either: a fragment of the equivalent original peptide sequence; or a homologue of a fragment of the equivalent original peptide sequence, which sequence is capable of tolerising an individual to the equivalent original peptide sequence and has a length of at least 9 amino acids, and wherein said homologue has at least 65% homology to any 9 contiguous amino acids in the equivalent original peptide sequence.
2. T cell Epitopes
Equivalents of T cell epitopes will be sequences that bind
to the same T cell receptor. Examiners may not be too pleased to see sequences
defined in terms of what they bind to. The example below shows the sorts of
equivalents that could be considered.
WO0125793
1. A method of
diagnosing coeliac disease, or susceptibility to coeliac disease, in an
individual comprising:
(a) contacting a sample from the host with an agent selected from
(i) the epitope comprising sequence which is: SEQ ID NO: 1 or 2, or an
equivalent sequence from a naturally occurring homologue of the gliadin
represented by SEQ ID NO : 3,
(ii) an epitope comprising sequence comprising: SEQ ID NO : 1, or an equivalent
sequence from a naturally occurring homologue of the gliadin represented by
SEQ ID NO : 3, which epitope is an isolated oligopeptide derived from a gliadin
protein,
(iii) an analogue of (i) or (ii) which is capable of being recognised by a T cell
receptor that recognises (i) or (ii), which in the case of a peptide analogue is not
more than 50 amino acids in length, or
(iv) a product comprising two or more agents as defined in (i), (ii) or (iii), and
(b) determining in vitro whether T cells in the sample recognise the agent;
recognition by the T cells indicating that the individual has, or is susceptible to,
coeliac disease.
individual comprising:
(a) contacting a sample from the host with an agent selected from
(i) the epitope comprising sequence which is: SEQ ID NO: 1 or 2, or an
equivalent sequence from a naturally occurring homologue of the gliadin
represented by SEQ ID NO : 3,
(ii) an epitope comprising sequence comprising: SEQ ID NO : 1, or an equivalent
sequence from a naturally occurring homologue of the gliadin represented by
SEQ ID NO : 3, which epitope is an isolated oligopeptide derived from a gliadin
protein,
(iii) an analogue of (i) or (ii) which is capable of being recognised by a T cell
receptor that recognises (i) or (ii), which in the case of a peptide analogue is not
more than 50 amino acids in length, or
(iv) a product comprising two or more agents as defined in (i), (ii) or (iii), and
(b) determining in vitro whether T cells in the sample recognise the agent;
recognition by the T cells indicating that the individual has, or is susceptible to,
coeliac disease.
3. Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms
(SNP’s)
SNP’s are often ‘associated’ with other SNP’s, i.e. they
tend to be found together in genomes. This is termed ‘linkage disequilibrium’. Diagnostic
tests that detect the presence of a particular SNP could also be based on
detecting SNP’s which are in linkage disequilibrium with it, and so it is worth
thinking about whether to attempt to claim those other SNP’s. See the example
below. [The Trilateral Report on SNP’s (see here)
provides useful guidance on how Patent Offices assess their patentability]
WO2010116137
1. A method of
testing a dog to determine the likelihood that the dog is protected from liver
copper accumulation, comprising detecting in a sample the presence or absence
in the genome of the dog of one or more polymorphisms selected from (a) SNP
ATP7a_Reg3_F_6 (SEQ ID NO: 142) and (b) one or more polymorphisms in linkage
disequilibrium with (a).
4. Crystal Factors and
Crystal Structures
Where the feature is essentially a numerical value or a set
of values then careful thought may be needed as to how to cover equivalents.
X-ray diffraction data (structure factors) and structural coordinates obtained
by crystallography are an example of this. As can be seen from the claims below
equivalents can be defined in terms of being ‘obtainable’ by the relevant
crystallographic method. [The Trilateral Report on claims relating to 3D
structures (see here) provides
guidance on how Patent Offices will examine such subject matter]
WO9910379
1. Use of the structure
factors obtainable by subjecting a crystal comprising at least an epitope
binding fragment of the SM3 antibody, bound to a peptide recognised by the
epitope binding site of SM3 to X-ray diffraction measurements to identify,
screen, characterise, design or modify a chemical entity.
2. Use of the structural coordinates obtainable by subjecting a crystal comprising at least the epitope binding fragment of the SM3 antibody, bound to a peptide recognised by the epitope binding site of SM3 to X-ray diffraction measurements and deducing the structural coordinates from the diffraction measurements, to identify, screen, characterise, design or modify a chemical entity.
2. Use of the structural coordinates obtainable by subjecting a crystal comprising at least the epitope binding fragment of the SM3 antibody, bound to a peptide recognised by the epitope binding site of SM3 to X-ray diffraction measurements and deducing the structural coordinates from the diffraction measurements, to identify, screen, characterise, design or modify a chemical entity.
You may also wish
to see related articles Top
10 Points about Gene and Protein Sequences and 10
Points on Patent Applications Directed to SNPs (single nucleotide
polymorphisms).
No comments:
Post a Comment